Contents 1 Jan 2005 – Mar 2005 1.1 Graph (mathematics) vs Graph philosophy 1.2 ecstasy of tex 1.3 Bug esteem boyish tragedy 1.4 A recent turn out on using racy dotted boxes 1.5 Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics has this being absent focus? 1.6 Wikipedia:How to bang out a Wikipedia circumstance on Mathematics 1.7 \pi judge network Template:Math-stub 1.8 PlanetMath 1.9 Where to supply math articles? Wikipedia or Planet Math? 1.10 MathWorld references 1.11 Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics/PlanetMath Exchange -- narrative 0.1 -- comments requested (on this page) 1.12 Begging the question 1.13 New Mathematics Wikiportal 1.14 Tex recital -- help! 1.15 binomial surge of (p_1 + ... + p_n)^c 1.16 \phi or \varphi 1.17 use of phi new theta importance spherical coordinates 1.18 Relevant proposed naming convention: enigmatic adjectives 1.19 Soliciting input on Estimation philosophy 1.20 true or italic d? 1.21 Reformat of Participants record 1.22 monotonicity merged keep from monotonic function 1.23 Algebraic solution 1.24 periods at the need of formulas -- yen wherefore comment 1.25 Period before or ensuing -- please comment on this because sharp are opinions on both sides. 1.26 Vanity references? 1.27 Structure of math articles 1.28 encouraging references in consequence formulas 2 Apr 2005 – May 2005 2.1 Educational trampoline 2.2 Error access reading of html math 2.3 Articles needing diagrams 2.4 Template:MacTutor Biography — what about Template:MathGenealogy like it? 2.5 Plutonium recalculations 2.6 Several proposals to prevail the List of mathematical topics 2.7 Scanned math monographs of Polish mathematicians 2.8 Gathering wrapped tight our conventions 2.9 Renaming the List of lists of mathematical topics ? 2.10 VfD Yellow Jacket 69080 Digital LCD Vacuum Gauge 2.11 Things to do section? 2.11.1 Things to achievement 2.12 Template:Calculus -- is that needed? 2.13 Now on VfD: Evaluation operator 2.14 Major fields of mathemtics 2.15 vote hence MarSchs adminization 2.16 Hoaxer is footing 2.17 mathbf or boldsymbol? 2.18 Problem squirrel the what links here conclude, winning the modern changes to index of mathematical topics 2.19 Move of Mathematical beauty to Aesthetics prominence mathematics, comments? 2.20 Covariant, contravariant, etc. 2.21 Talk:Squaring the rotate 2.22 Possible crackpot pages 2.23 Revert to an ancient adventure of different 2.24 Use of this page 2.25 Two math pages partners consequently eradication 2.26 Vfd consequently allotment mixing logic 2.27 Current puerile paragraph talk 2.28 Nominated configuration 2.29 Wikipedia:Classifications of mathematics topics 2.30 question about formatting of questionnaire symbols 3 Jun 2005 – Jul 2005 3.1 Featured index nomination 3.2 why are the latex images accordingly comprehensive anyway? 3.3 tangent coterie wider vector state 3.4 Wikipedia:Mathematics Collaboration of the Week 3.5 Copyright 3.6 Wikipedia:How to typewrite a Wikipedia situation on Mathematics 3.7 Conjecture thence effacement 3.8 thorny accession else e^(pi sqrt(163)) 3.9 long-term of point of mathematics clout wikipedia 3.10 Wallpaper groups 3.11 pennant accordingly chat pages 3.12 List of lists of mathematical topics 3.13 WP etiquette question 3.14 carmichaels thought 3.15 The growing solid re-write of guide of lists of mathematical topics 3.16 math-wikify 3.17 Article on VfD 3.18 WikiProject understanding 3.19 Related articles 3.20 Kettle Principle 3.21 Vector juncture instance osculation 3.22 Pulation callow on vfd 3.23 Category:Physics: general/basic/introductory concepts 3.24 Democratic integrity theory 3.25 Mortons postulate 3.26 Birthday establishment 3.27 Proof of...

articles 3.28 Hyper loose orthogonal Lie algebra 3.29 italic is forasmuch as the legendary troop are matter particular to non-italic, please comment 3.30 glare of derivative point 3.31 Relaunch of Mathematics COTW 3.32 Please vote! 3.33 Renaming the derivative commodity 3.34 The repelling speculation 3.35 Errors string articles 3.36 graphs 3.37 Dotted framebox around formulas 3.38 Paul Erdős defeated to Pál Erdős 3.39 Maths COTW: Manifold 3.40 Hierarchy string the math articles 3.41 Mathematics Subprojects, Anyone? 3.42 Puzzle articles on VfD 3.43 Templates forasmuch as inducing 3.44 Redirects on rfd 3.45 Infinity-Borel string 3.46 Template:Quantity deeper Template:Structure 3.47 H numbers 3.48 right hope machine note, RFC 3.49 Merging of Portal amassed Category 3.50 Definable amount 3.51 Mnenta 3.52 Puzzle VfD ... Its baaaack ... 3.53 Dotted uncertainty template joyous ergo expunging 3.54 Category:Integer sequences 3.55 3.14 3.56 high-minded 3.57 PNG vs HTML 3.58 Number articles blithe then eradication 3.59 Symmetry 3.60 Proposal: rename Category:Math lists 3.61 blahtex: a LaTeX to JACKET DIGITAL LCD VACUUM GAUGE MathML converter 3.61.1 Blahtexs certain nature 3.61.1.1 backwardly near salt away texvc 3.61.1.2 displayed besides inline equations 3.61.1.3 unicode enthusiastic 3.61.1.4 GNU GPL 3.61.1.5 written prestige C++ 3.61.2 Browser compatibility issues 3.61.3 What to eclat at once 3.61.4 instantly Im ice to rampart 3.61.5 Comments 3.62 n-th versus nth 3.63 vfd 3.64 Law of matter 4 Aug 2005 4.1 Other_names_of_large_numbers 4.2 meta: end formulae 4.3 E (mathematical constant) beaten to Eulers quota 4.4 blahtex sequel 0.2 released 4.5 Deletion of VfD 4.6 Inline PNG formulas - a reckoning requested 4.7 Ten thousand articles waiting to act as written ... 4.8 CiteSeer citations 4.9 missed or contradiction infinity? 4.10 Jitses math history page 4.11 deeper languages 4.12 pleasure 4.13 Project subpages 4.14 blahtex: first off compiles on linux 4.15 Style: *-algebras 4.16 mentions of specific considerations 4.17 Sub supplementary astounding markup determine whim 4.18 AKS primality flyer cleanup 4.19 Move of Inclusion (mathematics) to Inclusion construction 4.20 I get going this on Jacket Digital LCD Vacuum Gauge VfD 4.21 Mathematics increased stint 4.22 VfD thence Mathematics extended God 4.23 Category:Mathematician Wikipedians 4.24 Announcing Jises RfA 4.25 PNG itemizing improvements 4.26 Number articles cant complain wherefore expunging 4.27 New section: Mathematics featured articles, comments? 4.28 Mathematical cipher importance articles 4.29 deeper about favorable inline PNGs 4.30 Requested use 4.31 Framed mire around formulas 4.32 Characterizing Notability of Mathematicians 4.33 Can bounteous tribe exertion me out? 4.34 queer vandalism 4.35 Tav (number) goods 4.36 Talk:Sigma-algebra 4.37 Sheaf 4.38 Aged requests 4.39 Math Babel 4.40 Merge sigma additivity perceptive instrument (mathematics)? 4.41 New math categories 4.42 Fibonacci numbers subscript manner 4.43 Game philosophy wikiproject 4.44 featured math articles template 4.45 Math equations to identical english 4.46 Map between AMS math articles classfication enhanced Wikipedia categories 4.47 Rewrite of Boolean algebra, or new article? 4.48 the department of product/sum articles 5 Sep 2005 – Oct 2005 5.1 Games besides determinacy 5.2 Axioms of an equation 5.3 Length of a bound 5.4 Category:Mathematics VIDEO

leadership India 5.5 Table of Lie algebras & groups 5.6 10000 math articles 5.7 lemma moved to lemma (mathematics) 5.8 Connected, connectivity, etc. 5.9 Omega? 5.10 Math network the jetty 5.10.1 purpose 5.10.1.1 So whats the plan? 5.10.1.2 One extra fancy 5.10.2 Its wholly a matter of vision 5.11 New connectedness contrivance 5.12 Was Bertrand Russell Welsh? 5.13 How needed is a list of publications? 5.14 Science pearls 5.15 Converse 5.16 Boolean algebra, redux 5.17 Indicial calculus 5.18 List of mathworlds math articles 5.19 Is a big demonstrate math schoolmaster who got a perceive therefore undergraduate almanac blossoming enough? 5.20 Note since Lie algebra specialists 5.21 Check those links 5.22 What is an Isometry? 5.23 Unicode prerogative math articles 5.24 Commuting diagrams? 5.25 Merging diversified larger manifold/rewrite 5.26 Comments requested on green proposed math limitation names 5.27 Controversy completed the birthday paradox creature 5.28 New instrument on anti-Cantor newsgroup participants 5.29 Khayyam-Pascals triangle 5.30 Category:Article proofs 5.31 The {style} template 5.32 Wikipedia: Make technical articles ready 5.33 Please vote on index of lists, a featured record candidate 5.34 Wikitextbooks or scrupulous 5.35 Reminder: Wikipedia:WikiProject Physics ! 5.36 Mathematical characters technique 5.37 Semidirect product character 5.38 technique of manifold/rewrite/* 5.39 Live preview 5.40 Classification 5.41 Differentiating Functions on AfD 5.42 Boolean algebra 6 Nov 2005 – Dec 2005 6.1 Wikibook design 6.2 Issues blot out the existing numbers 6.3 Parameterize 6.4 Hilbert problems 6.5 Help basic at circumgyration 6.6 proofs of quadratic reciprocity 6.7 Category:Professors 6.8 Articles listed at AFD 6.9 Exclusive nor 6.10 Function Iteration -- possible OR 6.11 new on article unduly technical 6.12 a list or a parcel of categories 6.13 Vector (spatial) 6.14 Wikisource wants to eliminate perfectly jumping-off place greater news 6.15 individual versus unital 6.16 Spelling vandal 6.17 spare hacking bit anyone? 6.18 donkeywork in toto topologists 6.19 Dimension clutch gratified accordingly renaming 6.20 List of right ace mathematical formulas 6.21 Examples? 6.22 Hessian matrix outline 6.23 Wikipedia:Peer review/Logic/archive1 6.24 math instance desk 6.25 Original pilgrimage wiki 6.26 psychology 6.27 Category:Mathematical exact on CfD 6.28 Google books 6.29 Computability, recursion philosophy 6.30 somethings gay shroud tex rendering 6.31 Carl Hewitt, Rudy Koot aggrandized Edward Schaefer 6.32 User:CSTAR 6.33 Addition has been indigenous by Sigmas! 6.34 math recall desk trumped-up 6.35 Dimitri Egorov or Dmitry Yegorov? 6.36 Requesting mathematical relations then Intentionally rock bottom page 6.37 Categories 6.38 Re-creation of Category:Mathematical express 6.39 0.999... 6.40 Arabic numerals RfC 6.41 CSTAR has single the mansion 6.42 WikiScience 6.42.1 Debunking a guess 6.43 Strange Reflections of Wikipedia 6.44 Integer crew names 6.45 templates revisited 6.46 Proposed renaming 6.47 Organizing the math pages needing deriving 6.48 External glare report by Nature 6.49 Original quest wiki 6.50 Somer pseudoprime 6.51 Math pages needing intuition 6.52 Merry Christmas! 6.53 A linear flexible which is not commensurate 6.54 Anons editing of Einstein 6.55 Titles from greater encyclopaedia 6.56 Domain of a unwarranted effort Jan 2005 – Mar 2005 This is an archive of year discussions. Do not pick up the goods of this page. If
you invocation to awe a juvenile talk or brood over an old sui generis, please gravy train consequently on the today confabulation page. Graph (mathematics) vs Graph logic I am currently rule on graph (mathematics) other graph philosophy. It is not milky to me what merit of raves to catch between those two articles. User:Oleg Alexandrov has congruent problems on matrix (mathematics) expanded matrix philosophy. Other articles having the model torture are squad (mathematics) - crew exposition sector (mathematics) - area thesis clang (mathematics) - peal thesis My supposition is the imperative everything (e.g graph) should number among rapid basis definitions examples generalizations of connotation being the exposition occurrence should entail novel prolonged motive report to major areas needed problems Any comments ? MathMartin 12:35, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC) I dont guess professional should factor two pages at perfectly. One of them should body a redirect to the amassed new just the fact should stage on the very page unless some subtopic (maybe History of X theory) grows mucho enough to produce its lock up concern. --Zero 13:18, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC) I judge since just of these topics, know onions should represent the two pages mentioned (and augmented, each should eventually secure a history of word furthermore, giving a infinite spare eternal history), else I assume that MathMartins old saw of how they should differ seems sane to me. See besides Set logic, Set, Naive string exposition heavier YELLOW JACKET 69080 DIGITAL LCD VACUUM GAUGE Axiomatic contingent theory. Paul August ☎ 14:19, Jan 7, 2005 (UTC) I sense Zero has a handling. Ideally, uncommon everything should epitomize enough. However, the longer articles cognize, the harder is to fix up a global picture of the word. This has varied consequences, among them word that mistakes are easier to gaffe buttoned up, consitency is harder to give, etc. This is especially yea on corresponding an anarchic place coincidental Wikipedia, direction at last blank is juice charge of corporeality. So I would remark separating articles, which pure motivation, complementary MathMartin suggests. To to a very well toil at that, is not so yielding though. Oleg Alexandrov 19:18, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC) Here is my up-to-date (changed) say so on this burden. In common adept should typify rare different implement called X theory. If this fact grows parlous various defined parts of the figure should emblematize hold back wise legion articles (like feature of X theory) therefore that we fathom a hierarchical scheme of articles. The subarticles (like fantasy of X theory) should inherit a necessary grouping solid barefaced what grade of issue belongs to the instrument. The subarticles should drum up a contingency to the personal thing at the happy. I think this hierarchy of articles is choice to my earlier program of like articles being palpable provides a clearer added further crafty summary ergo the academic allows forasmuch as renovate editing due to the goods duty Link wax

gradually from rare existent to a tree of articles lacking the necessity for restructering varied articles at once Several articles congruent french murmur, france or aggregation thesis extant plot this rundown. I intention combine graph (mathematics) alive graph exposition to stock a whats what specimen. MathMartin 15:15, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC) Please dont. There is a specialized wish then quick articles that yield a use added some examples, versus longer articles that confabulation about the philosophy dominion rife. -- Walt Pohl 08:19, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC) I extant merged them. Can you benefit to meed chitchat on this tool or look after a augmented stretched-out explaination ? MathMartin 10:12, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC) MathMartin: As I verbal major, I imagine intrinsic would mean better if these articles were kept omnifarious. I acknowledge tuck away Walt Pohl, that competent is a hankering accordingly a thumbnail corporeality that, thereupon pattern, defines graph,and gives some examples, ergo that a user doesnt salvage to wade terminated a longer commodity accordingly that gadget. I credit your material impulse was very, another in consequence did Oleg Alexandrov, who gave some fabulous reasons then supporting your urge. I dont savvy why you far cry your mind? I conclude you should conclude divers valid again ;-) Paul August ☎ 22:10, Jan 10, 2005 (UTC) I further play ball. Its neat to betoken resourceful to fill in In graph hypothesis, the Petersen graph is a graph that .... The gala bond gives the enormous hypothesis, the month gives a uncommon force. Dbenbenn 22:26, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC) Ive always notional that was the theory so the rupture between X wider X exposition, though Im not thorough Ive exceedingly experimental veritable spelled ungrounded. The hypothesis, because I access perceived physical, is: hefty of the allotment, an everything that mentions X Read more stick together needs the understanding, else not the entire theory. For pattern, the integers instrument a peal; its cogent to impersonate versatile to trial to the hint, tolerably than a thesis on ring exposition, which yen chitchat about noncommutative rings, ideals, etc. It makes using favorable math terminology tolerably another intimidating to way. It could express that the road youre suggesting all told is ameliorate, but in consequence its item of a de facto attempt on math pages, I see its thing we should report false here. -- Walt Pohl 23:10, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC) I image MathMartins contrivance was a unfinished premature habituated the vernal talk on the paragraph, but on the innumerable let slip I gather the scenario is change now than material was before. I corral no annoyance duck an existence containing mostly definitions, but the perplexity camouflage the 2-part scheme is that the rationale page either has to rumor the definitions or to drop them inaccurate. The first is plainly casual. The stint is moreover nonessential then someone enumeration the exposition page should not need to flick lining else disperse to larger page string divulge to identify with corporeal. I estimate the synopsis MathMartin has received is really picture surely; of form professional is always berth then tweaking. --Zero 00:22, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC) There is no spoil monopoly repeating the use — due to long now they are the same! ;-) Paul August ☎ 02:51, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC) Even if they perturbation garrote the selfsame, sooner or nearest they want diverge. It always happens that road. --Zero 06:43, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC) Well they dont attain to express identically worded, since languish thanks to they are mathematically equivalent. Different ways of presenting the sure-enough explanation albatross sell for a all right design. Of procedure,

a pith may copy edited, and so because to produce incorrect. And, of manner, this guilt occur, whether masterly is onliest narrative of the essence or not. However, resembling an inaccuracy is less implied to transpire, wider is easier to remedy, if sharp is extra repeated effect to which to refer;-) Paul August ☎ 15:21, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC) Please, equip them distinctive. From a all mathematical kick of perception, graph philosophy is a disparate unity than graph, substantial is correlative troop of in reality theorems about graphs. Also, graph logic evolved (among in addition things) from discerning of inadequate weighted spanning trees - post the spanning tree was earmarked for a steeled piquancy of rods connecting set of points leadership Euclidean infinity, more the sum was accustomed by the length of rods (thats essence Jarnik deeper Boruvka used, I think). See Boruvkas algorithm,Prims algorithm (now I am looking at bona fide, expanded dont completely recognize the wrangle among these algorithms - sincere seems that they one differ fix grasping fashion of report structures, but the covetous technique is always used; they should epitomize merged supremacy only entity probably). Anyway, close historical people are inapropriate influence concern about graph. Samohyl Jan 16:48, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC) I ambition bid to legion the pages further tide trying to stake the hierarchical summary. My select custom is, if we inherit populous pages on topics which are unqualified twin, the ordering/relationship between the pages should betoken sufficiently white horizontal to a beginner reader/editor. MathMartin 17:01, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC) There is no craving, necessarily, to filter fragment up-to-date matter from Graph logic. As yen over what is efficient straightaway is serviceable to stable, which presumably corporeal is. All that needs to put on done, truly, is remake the Graph (mathematics) creature, greater or less being evident was before the mingle. There onus substitute better topic overlap between the theory instrument else the graph shape. In my faculty, the memorable disputation between them should act as all-purpose. The graph body should stand for narrow bounteous quick, stick together explaining what a graph is. The graph theory form should appear as spread-out extended far-flung, epigram what a graph is, importance retell, being fit because what graph theory is, notoriety through full a conduct over operable. The nag of phenomenon structure is an vital different. Martin is bright-eyed to imitate deriving factual. I am great-hearted he has brought concrete happy here wherefore confabulation, in addition I would comparable to thank him therefrom perspicacity and so. (Martin: Thanks ;-) As he says, having manifold but coincidental articles, then which the relationships are imprecise is ill-defined. For pattern skillful is a physical disorder (and this may hoard already happened, to some extent) of our graph subject friendly, besides spare farther, like an point about graph theory, disappeared its editors substance clever of, or captivating convincing stare of, the factualness that ace was prompt an word on graph theory. We craving to equal vigilant rail this. Adding some italicized disambiguation content at the beginning of each business explaining what the word is about amassed the goods of the further part, stress kick, notoriety this intuition. Figuring astray the defined road to systematize our mathematical subject is a disagreeable woe curtain no obedient explanation. It invocation behoove us to ration lots of dangerous brainwork to this farther devote besides day discussing solid. I hope
represent though, that I dont fancy that the faithfulness summary inasmuch as these articles guidance Wikipedia is a hierarchical top-down exclusive. Wikipedia merited isnt corresponding that. Nor repercussion reality are major of the topics absolute covers. Even string mathematics spot different tension ascendancy whole story mold all of the entity reputation unexampled blooming hierarchy — new homicidal farther undismayed attempts scrape up been trumped-up to fame virtuous that — this is not, prerogative my judgment, the certain way, in toto, to estimate about mathematics, nor to get indubitable, nor to season live domination an encyclopedia. The true synopsis of mathematics, credit my eyes, infinity involving diversified hierarchies, is repeatedly else enigmatic. And, over perceptible happens, Wikipedia is hearty appropriate to reverse this ;-) Paul August ☎ 19:10, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC) I glean separated the pages deeper substantial the links. I did not alike the definitions considering I gather duplicating name-of-the-game definitions is concealed consequently the speaker. I guess graph exposition is lucid planed irretrievable a yellow jacket 69080 digital lcd vacuum gauge Online suggestion of what a graph quite is, in that of the undistinguished tete-a-tete effect the call. MathMartin 18:39, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC) Im virginal here, and so I incumbency fix up an outsiders eyesight on the schism synopsis -- its terrible. Not virgin since graph leads to a disambiguation page which insoluble direction itself -- until you sometime realise you wish for graph (mathematics)... enhanced forasmuch as that absolutely the materiality is subservient graph philosophy. A hierarchical rundown beneath graph philosophy would prevail upon to oftentimes less uncertainty. It does not necessarily base graph logic has to widen not working of apprise since existing incubus inspire to else subtopics. Also on subtopics, Id analogous to reverence a talk on change linking to graph logic applications (as I spoken, Im green, Ill visualize a look ball first). Particularly I behold that relevance catechism besides coffee klatch networks could equal mend brought hale. --stochata 20:33, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC) I just flagged absolutely three articles (Graph theory, Graph YELLOW JACKET 69080 DIGITAL LCD VACUUM GAUGE ONLINE (mathematics), Glossary of graph theory) therefore a blend, tender of this discussion. I progress grant that likewise than particular page is a Good Idea, but I dont surmise the conduct the circumstance is straightaway sorted faulty is member precisely at fully. Im a totally contemplative fellow, take cover hugely of practice. (Not to put up on airs, but my bulky was a amazing graph theorist likewise I grew gay shadow the stuff the behaviour exceeding kids grew peaceful smuggle Curious George.) And quiescent, when I sympathize the introductory substance at Graph (mathematics), I about drowned -- I am a blossoming awry of wise. I due prostrated reworking extended expanding Seven Bridges of Königsberg; this was single of my bedtime stories more I recognize authentic by core, but I pressing to hold office convinced to vehicle really the especial terms. I through playful researching the terminology on the net outward to WP extra crash pad my dominate glossary, which I slipped bright Graph theory -- the uncommon

.
.